“Turn off the lights”: Electric car AI understands wrong command and causes road collision

Artificial intelligence misinterpretation in Lynk & Co model left vehicle in the dark after driver asked to turn off interior lights

Failure in the voice command of the electric car prompted an internet recall in China (Photos: Lynk & Co | Disclosure)
By Tom Schuenk
Published on 2026-03-03 at 12:00 PM
Updated on 2026-03-03 at 12:24 PM

The advancement of artificial intelligence in modern vehicles has reached a dangerous limit in China: a software glitch in the Lynk & Co Z20 allowed the voice assistance system to turn off the exterior headlights while the electric car was moving, resulting in a collision with the median of a highway. The case, recorded by on-board cameras, exposes the risks of integrating voice commands into vital security functions without layers of physical protection.

SEE ALSO:

Misinterpretation and the collision of the Lynk & Co Z20

Lynk Co Z206
Lynk & Co Z20 is an electric SUV from the brand derived from Volvo (and belonging to the Geely group)

The incident occurred when the driver tried to turn off the internal reading lights using verbal language. However, the artificial intelligence of the vehicle’s voice assistant interpreted the request in a generic way and disabled all external lighting. When immersed in total darkness at high speed, the driver lost the reference of the lane and crashed. In an attempt to reactivate the headlights by voice during the emergency, the system replied that the operation could not be completed at that time.

The response of the automaker, controlled by the Geely group, was immediate after the repercussion of the video on Chinese social networks. The company’s deputy sales manager, Chen Siyuan, confirmed the release of an emergency update via the internet to correct the software’s logic. The new version prevents the headlights from being deactivated by voice command while the vehicle is in a driving gear.

Risks of full integration into critical systems

The episode raises a debate about the safety architecture of connected cars. Tests carried out by owners of other brands, such as Zeekr and Deepal, revealed similar vulnerabilities, where voice commands were able to bypass security locks. Experts argue that essential functions such as lighting and brakes should be isolated from software interfaces that are prone to context errors, ensuring that physical control always prevails over intelligent automation.

0 Comments
Comments are the sole responsibility of their authors and do not represent the opinion of this site. Comments containing profanity or offensive language will not be published. If you identify anything that violates the terms of use, please report it.
Avatar
Leave one comment